- A scoping review of 47 precision medicine publications found that overall quality assessment scores were moderate, with none achieving a positive evaluation across all 11 items.
- Most abstracts reported findings relevant to precision medicine pillars but lacked details on patient and public involvement, reporting accuracy measures, and controlling false-positive reporting.
- A stakeholder survey with a Delphi panel identified 25 essential checklist items for reporting standards in precision medicine research.
- The final BePRECISE checklist includes items related to equity, diversity, study population description, precision medicine study design, methods, results reporting, and discussion of limitations and clinical implications.
- Authors are encouraged to adhere to existing reporting guidelines and use the BePRECISE checklist to improve transparency and reproducibility in precision medicine research.
Source link
InternalMedicine,Oncology,PrecisionMedicine,Research,ReportingGuidelines,BePRECISEChecklist